Stars and Constellations
|
Information about stars The stars are self –luminous objects ,shining by radiation derived from energy sources within themselves . by contrast , planets shine by reflected light only, while gaseous and diffuse nebulae may shine either by reflected light or (essentially) by fluorescence. As far as its properties can be compared with those of other stars , the sun is a typical star . it has a mass more than 300, 000 times that of the earth , 1.99 X 1030 kg ., a radius of
696000 km .(about 432,200 mi.) and a power output of 3.8 X 1023 KW. The masses , radii and luminosities of other stars are often expressed in terms of that of the sun . Table I gives data pertaining to the 20 brightest stars or, more precisely , stellar systems , since some of them are double or even triple stars . Note that all of these stars are as bright or brighter than the sun ; some of the companions are fainter . stars such as Altair, a Centauri and Procyon are called dwarf stars; their dimensions are roughly comparable with that of the sun. Sirius and Vega are also dwarf stars; their higher temperature give a large rate of emission per unit area. Aldebaran , Arcturus and capella are examples of giant stars . thus , measurements with the interferometer (which gives the angular diameter ) combined with parallax measurements give diameters of 24 and 45 solar diameters for Arcturus and Aldebaran , respectively . Betelgeuse and antares are examples of supergiants . The latter has a diameter 200 times that of the sun whereas the diameter of Betelgeuse (if we choose a distance 1,700 light- years) is 250 times . other examples of supergiants include a Herculis and the variable Mira whose diameters are 580 and 460 times as great as that of the sun . several white dwarf stars of low luminosity and high densities are listed . Table II gives the 20 nearest known stars . Only a Centauri , procyon and Sirius apper in both lists . all other stars are fainter than the sun and most of them can most of them can be seen only with the telescope. The highly luminous stars can be seen at great distance; in trinsically faint stars can be seen only if they are very near the sun. |
Constellations
In astronomy the name given to certain groupings of stars (from the Lat. Constellatus, studded with stars; con, with and Stella, star). From the earliest times the star-groups known as constellations, the smaller groups (parts of constellations) known as asterisms, and also individual stars, have revived names connoting some meteorological phenomena, or symbolizing religious or mythological beliefs. At one time it was held that the constellation names and myths were of Greek origin: this view has now been disproved, and an examination of Hellenic myths associated with the stars and star groups in light of the records revealed by the decipherment of Euphratean cuneiforms leads to the conclusion that in many, if not all, cases the Greek myth has Euphratean parallel, and so renders it probable that the Greek constellation system and the cognate legends are primarily of Semitic or even pre-Semitic origin. The Sumerians and Acadians, the non Semitic inhabitants of the Euphrates valley prior to the Babylonian, described the stars collectively as a “heavenly flock”; the sun was the “old sheep”; the seven planets were the “old sheep stars”; the whole of the stars had certain “shepherds,” and Sibzianna (which according to Sayce and Bosanquet, is the modern Arcturus, the brightest star in the northern sky) was the “star of the shepherds of the
heavenly herds. The Acadians bequeathed their system to the Babylonians, and cuneiform tablets and cylinders, boundary stones, and Euphratean art generally point to the existence of a well-defined system of star names in their nature of rather speculative value, R. Brown, junr. (Primitive Constellations, 1899) has compiled a Euphratean plain sphere, which he regards as the mother of all others. The tablets examined range in date from 3000- 500 B.C., and hence the system must be anterior to the earlier date. Of great importance is the Creation Legend, a cuneiform compiled form older records during the reign of Assur-bani-pal, c. 650 B.C., in which there occurs a passage interpretable as pointing to the acceptance of 36 constellations: 12 northern, 12 zodiacal, and 12 southern. The Phoenicians a race dominated by the spirit of commercial enterprise appear to have studied the stars more especially with respect to their service to navigators; according to Homer “the stars were sent by Zeus as portents for mariners.’’ But all their truly astronomical writings are lost, and only by somewhat speculative piecing together of scattered evidence can an estimate of their knowledge be formed. The inter relations of the Phoenicians with the early Hellenes were frequent and far reaching, and in the Greek presentation of the legends concerning constellations a distinct Phoenician, and in turn Euphratean, element appears. One of the earliest examples of Greek literature extant, the Theogonia of Hesiod (c. 800 B.C.), appears to be a curious blending of Hellenic and Phoenician thought. Although not astronomical work, several constellation subjects are introduced. In the same author’s works and days, a treatise which is a sort of shepherd’s calendar, there are distinct references to Pleiades, Hyades, Orion, Sirius, and, Arcturus. It cannot be argued, however, that these were the only stars and constellations named in his time; the omission proves nothing. The same is true of the Homeric epics wherein the Pleiades, Hyades, Ursa major, Orion, and Bootes are mentioned, and also of the stars and constellations mentioned in Job. Further support is given to view that, in the main, the constellations were transmitted to the Greeks by the Phoenicians from the Euphratean sources in the fact that Thales, the earliest Greek Astronomer of any note, was of Phoenician decent. According to Callimachus he thought the Greeks to steer by Ursa minor instead of Ursa major; and other astronomical observations are assigned to him. But his writings are lost, as is also the case with those of Phocus the Samian and the history of astronomy by Eudemus, the pupil of Aristotle; hence the paucity of our Knowledge of Thales’s astronomical learning. From the 6th century B.C. onwards, legends concerning the constellation subject were frequently treated by the historians and poets. Aglaosthenes or Agaosthenes, an early writer, knew Ursa minor, Cynosura, and recorded the translation of Capricornus and the star Capella; Pherecydes of Athens recorded the legend of Orion and stated the astronomical fact that when Orion sets Scorpio rises; Aeschylus and Hellanicus of Mytilene narrated the legend of the seven Pleiades. In the 5th century B.C. the Athenian astronomer Euctemon, according to Geminus of Rhodes, compiled a weather calendar in which Aquarius, Aquila, Canis major, Corona, Cygnus, Delphinus, Lyra, Orion, Pegasus, Sagitta, and the asterisms Hyades and Pleiades are mentioned, always, however, in relation to weather changes. The earliest Greek work which purported to treat the constellations Qua Constellations, which we have certain knowledge. The original is lost, but a versification by Aratus, a poet at the court of Antigonus Gonatas, king of Macedonia, or commentary by Hipparchs are extant. In Aratus’s work 44 constellations are enumerated, 19 northern : Ursa minor , Draco, ciphers, Cassiopeia , andromeda , perseus , Triangulum , Pegasus , Delphinus , auriga ,Hercules , Lyra , Cygnus , Aquila, Sagitta, corona and serpentarius ; I3 centeral or zodiacal ; Aries, Taurus, Gemini , cancer , Leo , Virgo , Libra , Scorpio , Sagittarius , Capricornus , Aquarius , Pisces and the Pleiades ; and I2 southern: Orion, Canis , lepus , argo , cetus , eridanus , Piscis australis , ara, centaurus, hydra, crater and corvus. In this enumeration serpents is included in secretaries and lupus in centaurs ; these two constellations were separated by Hipparchus and , later ,by Ptolemy. On the other hand , Aratus kept the Pleiades distinct from Taurus ,but Hipparchus reduced these stars to an asterism . Aratus was no astronomer , while Hipparchus was ; and from the fact that the latter adopted , with but trifling exceptions , the constellation system portrayed by Aratus , it may be concluded that the system was already familiar in greek thought . Three hundred years after Hipparchus , the Alexandrian astronomer Ptolemy ,adopted a very similar
scheme in his uranometria which appears in the seventh and eight books of his almagest , the catalogue being styled “ or accepted version .” the names and orientation of the 48 constellations therein adopted are, with but few exceptions, identical with those used at the present day; and as it cannot be doubted that Ptolemy made only very few modifications in the system of Hipparchus, the names were adopted at last three centuries before the Almagest was compiled. A later innovator of the moment was Johann Bayer, a German astronomer, who published a Uranometria in 1603, in which 12 constellations, all in the southern hemisphere, were added to Ptolemy’s 48, viz., Apis (or Musca). Avis Indica (Bird of Hydrrus water snake), Indus (Indian), Pavo ( Peacock), Phoenix, Piscis volans (flying fish), Toucan, Triangulum australe. According to W . Lynn, Bayer adapted this part of his catalogue from the observations of the Dutch navigator Petrus Theodori, who died in 1596 off Java. The coelum stellatum Christianum of Julius Schiller (1627) is noteworthy for the attempt made to replace the names connoting mythological and pagan ideas by the names of apostles, saints, popes, bishops, and other dignitaries of the Church, etc. Aries became St. Peter; the Manager; Canis major, David; and so on. This innovation (with which the introduction of the 12 apostles into the solar zodiac by the Venerable Bede may be compared) was short-lived. A similar confusion was attempted by E. Weigelius, who sought to introduce a Coelum heraldicum, in which the constellations were figured as the arms or insignia of European dynasties, and by symbols of commerce. In Edmund Halley’s southern catalogue, published in 1679 and incorporated in Flamsteed’s Histiria coelestis (1725), the following constellations are named: Piscis australis, Columba Noachi, Argo navis, Robur Caroli, Ara, Corona australis, Grus, Phoenix, Pavo, Apua or Avis Indica, Musca apis, Chameleon, Triangulum australe, Piscis volans, Dorado, Toucan or Anser Americanus, and Hydrus. Flamsteed’s maps also contained Mons Menelai. This list contains nothing new except Rrobur Carpli, since Columba Noachi (Noah’s dove) had been raised to the skies by Bartschius in 1624. In 1690 two posthumous works of Johann Hevelius(1611-87), added several new constellations to the list. In 1679 Augustine Royer Introduced the most interesting of the constellations of the southern hemisphere, the Crux Australis or Southern Cross. Nicolas Louis de Lacaille, who made extended observations of the southern stars in 1751 and in the following years, and whose results were embodied in his posthumous Coelum australe stelliferum (1763). Attempts have been made to introduce new constellations since that date, but none of these is now accepted. The large Ptolemaic constellations of Argo is, however, subdivided into Vela (Sails), Puppies (Stern), and Carina (Keel). The delimitation of précis boundaries for the constellations was undertaken by a committee of the International Astronomical union. At the present time it is possible to assign any star to its proper constellation without ambiguity. |