Stars and Constellations


Information about stars     

      The stars are self –luminous objects ,shining by radiation derived from energy sources within themselves . by contrast , planets shine by reflected light only, while gaseous and diffuse nebulae may shine either by reflected light or (essentially) by fluorescence. As far  as its properties can be compared with those of other stars , the sun is a typical star . it has  a mass more than  300, 000 times that of the earth , 1.99 X  1030 kg  ., a radius of

 696000  km .(about 432,200 mi.) and a power output of  3.8 X  1023 KW. The masses , radii and luminosities of other stars are often expressed  in terms of that of the sun .

      Table I gives  data pertaining to the 20 brightest stars or, more precisely , stellar systems , since some of them are double or even triple stars . Note that  all of these stars are as bright or brighter  than the sun ;  some of the companions are fainter . stars such  as Altair,

       a Centauri  and Procyon are  called dwarf stars; their  dimensions are  roughly  comparable  with that of the sun. Sirius and Vega are also  dwarf stars; their higher temperature give a large rate of  emission per unit area. Aldebaran , Arcturus and capella are examples of giant stars . thus , measurements  with the interferometer (which gives the angular diameter )  combined with parallax measurements give diameters  of 24 and 45 solar diameters for Arcturus  and Aldebaran , respectively . Betelgeuse and  antares  are  examples of  supergiants . The latter has a diameter  200  times that of the sun whereas the diameter  of Betelgeuse  (if we choose a distance  1,700 light- years)  is 250 times . other examples of supergiants  include a Herculis  and the variable Mira whose  diameters are 580 and 460 times as great as that of the sun . several white dwarf stars of low luminosity and high densities  are  listed .

      Table II gives the 20 nearest  known stars . Only a Centauri , procyon and Sirius  apper in both lists . all other stars are fainter  than the sun and  most of them can most of them can be seen only  with the telescope. The highly luminous stars  can be seen at  great distance; in trinsically faint  stars can be seen only if they are very near the sun. 


Constellations

 (click here to go to the constellations in the appendix)

      

      In astronomy the name given to certain groupings of stars (from the Lat. Constellatus, studded with stars; con, with and Stella, star).

      From the earliest times the star-groups known as constellations, the smaller groups (parts of constellations) known as asterisms, and also individual stars, have revived  names  connoting some meteorological phenomena, or symbolizing religious or mythological beliefs. At one time it was held that the constellation names and myths were of Greek origin: this view has now been disproved, and an examination of Hellenic  myths associated with the stars and star groups in light of the records revealed by the decipherment of Euphratean cuneiforms leads to the conclusion that in many, if not all, cases the Greek myth has Euphratean parallel, and so renders it probable that the Greek constellation system and the cognate legends are primarily of Semitic or even pre-Semitic origin.

      The Sumerians and Acadians, the non Semitic inhabitants of the Euphrates valley prior to the Babylonian, described the stars collectively as a “heavenly flock”; the sun was the “old sheep”; the seven planets were the “old sheep stars”; the whole of the stars had certain “shepherds,” and Sibzianna (which according to Sayce and Bosanquet, is the modern Arcturus, the brightest star in the northern  sky) was the “star of the  shepherds of the 

 heavenly herds. The Acadians bequeathed their system to the Babylonians, and cuneiform tablets  and cylinders, boundary stones, and Euphratean art generally point to the existence of a well-defined system of star names in their nature of rather  speculative value,  R. Brown, junr. (Primitive Constellations, 1899) has compiled a Euphratean plain sphere, which he regards as the  mother of all others. The tablets examined range in date from 3000- 500 B.C., and hence the system must be anterior to the earlier date. Of great importance is the Creation Legend, a cuneiform compiled form older records during the reign of Assur-bani-pal,  c. 650 B.C., in which there occurs a passage interpretable as pointing to the acceptance of 36 constellations: 12 northern, 12 zodiacal, and 12 southern.

      The Phoenicians a race dominated by the spirit of commercial enterprise appear to have studied the stars more especially with respect to their service to navigators; according to Homer “the stars were sent by Zeus as portents for mariners.’’ But all their truly astronomical writings are lost, and only by somewhat speculative piecing together of scattered evidence can an  estimate of their knowledge be formed. The  inter relations  of the Phoenicians with the early  Hellenes were frequent and far reaching, and in the  Greek presentation of the legends  concerning  constellations a distinct Phoenician, and in turn  Euphratean, element appears. One of the earliest examples of Greek literature extant, the Theogonia of Hesiod (c. 800 B.C.), appears to be a curious blending of Hellenic and Phoenician  thought.  Although not astronomical work, several constellation subjects are introduced. In the same author’s works and days, a treatise which is a sort of  shepherd’s calendar, there are distinct references to Pleiades, Hyades, Orion, Sirius, and, Arcturus. It cannot be argued, however, that these were the only stars and constellations named in his time; the omission proves nothing.

      The same is true of the Homeric epics wherein the Pleiades, Hyades, Ursa major, Orion, and Bootes are mentioned, and also of the stars and constellations mentioned in Job. Further support is given to view that, in the main, the constellations were transmitted to the Greeks by the Phoenicians from the Euphratean sources in the fact that Thales, the earliest  Greek Astronomer of any note, was  of Phoenician decent. According to Callimachus he thought the Greeks to steer by Ursa minor instead of Ursa major; and other astronomical observations are assigned to him. But his writings are lost, as is also the case with those of Phocus the Samian and the history of astronomy by Eudemus, the pupil of Aristotle; hence the paucity of our Knowledge of Thales’s astronomical learning.

      From the 6th century B.C. onwards, legends concerning the constellation subject were frequently treated by the historians and poets. Aglaosthenes or Agaosthenes, an early writer, knew Ursa minor, Cynosura, and recorded the translation of Capricornus and the star Capella; Pherecydes of Athens recorded the legend of Orion and stated the astronomical fact that when Orion sets Scorpio rises; Aeschylus and Hellanicus of Mytilene narrated the legend of the seven Pleiades. 

      In the 5th century B.C. the Athenian astronomer Euctemon, according to Geminus of Rhodes, compiled a weather calendar in  which Aquarius, Aquila, Canis major, Corona, Cygnus, Delphinus,  Lyra, Orion, Pegasus, Sagitta, and the asterisms Hyades and Pleiades are mentioned, always, however, in relation to weather changes. The earliest Greek work which purported to treat the constellations Qua Constellations, which we have certain knowledge. The original is lost, but a versification  by  Aratus, a poet at the court of Antigonus Gonatas, king of Macedonia, or commentary by Hipparchs are extant.

      In Aratus’s work 44 constellations are enumerated, 19 northern :  Ursa minor , Draco, ciphers, Cassiopeia , andromeda , perseus  , Triangulum , Pegasus , Delphinus , auriga ,Hercules , Lyra , Cygnus , Aquila, Sagitta, corona and serpentarius ; I3  centeral or zodiacal ; Aries, Taurus, Gemini , cancer , Leo , Virgo , Libra , Scorpio , Sagittarius , Capricornus , Aquarius , Pisces and the Pleiades ; and I2  southern: Orion, Canis , lepus , argo , cetus , eridanus , Piscis australis , ara, centaurus, hydra, crater and corvus. In this enumeration serpents is included in secretaries and lupus in centaurs ; these two constellations were separated by Hipparchus and , later ,by Ptolemy. On the other hand , Aratus kept the Pleiades distinct  from Taurus ,but Hipparchus reduced these stars to an asterism . Aratus was no astronomer , while Hipparchus  was ; and from the fact that the latter adopted , with but trifling exceptions , the constellation  system portrayed  by Aratus , it may be concluded that the system was already familiar in greek thought .

      Three hundred years after Hipparchus , the Alexandrian astronomer  Ptolemy ,adopted a  very similar

 scheme in his uranometria  which appears in the seventh and eight books of his almagest , the catalogue being styled  “  or  accepted  version .”  the names and orientation of the 48 constellations therein adopted are, with but few exceptions, identical with those used at the present day; and as it cannot be doubted that Ptolemy made only very few modifications in the system of Hipparchus, the names were adopted at last  three centuries before the  Almagest was compiled.

      A later innovator of the moment was Johann Bayer, a German astronomer, who published a Uranometria in 1603, in which 12  constellations, all in the southern hemisphere, were added to  Ptolemy’s 48, viz., Apis (or Musca). Avis Indica (Bird of Hydrrus water snake), Indus (Indian), Pavo ( Peacock), Phoenix,  Piscis volans (flying fish), Toucan, Triangulum australe. According  to W . Lynn, Bayer adapted this part of his catalogue from the observations of the Dutch navigator Petrus Theodori, who died in 1596 off Java.

      The coelum stellatum Christianum of Julius Schiller (1627) is noteworthy for the attempt made to replace the names connoting mythological and pagan ideas by the names of apostles, saints,  popes, bishops, and other dignitaries of the Church, etc. Aries  became St. Peter; the Manager; Canis major, David; and so on. This innovation (with which the introduction of the 12 apostles  into the solar zodiac by the Venerable Bede may be compared) was short-lived. A similar confusion was attempted by E. Weigelius, who sought to introduce a Coelum heraldicum, in which the  constellations  were figured as the arms or insignia of European dynasties, and by symbols of commerce.

      In Edmund  Halley’s southern catalogue, published in 1679 and incorporated in Flamsteed’s  Histiria coelestis (1725), the following constellations are named: Piscis australis, Columba Noachi, Argo navis, Robur Caroli, Ara, Corona australis, Grus, Phoenix, Pavo, Apua or Avis Indica, Musca apis,  Chameleon, Triangulum australe, Piscis volans, Dorado, Toucan or Anser Americanus, and Hydrus. Flamsteed’s maps  also contained Mons  Menelai. This list contains nothing  new except Rrobur Carpli, since Columba Noachi (Noah’s dove) had been raised to the skies by Bartschius in 1624.

      In 1690 two posthumous works of Johann Hevelius(1611-87), added several new constellations to the list. In 1679 Augustine Royer Introduced the most interesting of the constellations of the southern hemisphere, the Crux Australis or Southern Cross.

      Nicolas Louis de Lacaille, who made extended observations of the southern stars in 1751 and in the following years, and whose results were embodied in his posthumous Coelum australe stelliferum (1763).

      Attempts have been made to introduce new constellations since that date, but none of these is now accepted. The large Ptolemaic constellations of Argo is, however,  subdivided into  Vela (Sails), Puppies (Stern), and Carina (Keel).

      The delimitation of précis boundaries for the constellations was undertaken by a committee of the International Astronomical union. At the present time it is possible to assign any star to its proper constellation without ambiguity. 


Polar star or The north star